THIS IS A TEST INSTANCE. Feel free to ask and answer questions, but take care to avoid triggering too many notifications.
0

RLC-NR decoding under MAC for DRB

  • retag add tags

Hi , I have dumped the packets at wireshark on UDP , when the decoding happens at wireshark there is no issue when its SRB 1,2 under MAC . Whereas when I try to see the same for data packets which fall under LCID 4 , the RLC headers are not shown . Is there anything I am missing here? I am not able to upload image of this to show the problem . Regards, Akhila

Akhila's avatar
3
Akhila
asked 2022-11-17 06:58:02 +0000
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag close merge delete

Comments

To share an image or capture file, place them on a public file share and update the question with a link to them.
Also helps if you add version info (wireshark -v or Help->About Wireshark:Wireshark) to the question.

Chuckc's avatar Chuckc (2022-11-17 15:23:08 +0000) edit
add a comment see more comments

1 Answer

0

In order for the mac-nr dissector to know how to dissect a DRB lcid, it needs to know how the mode, SN length and drb number . The mac-nr preference, 'Source of LCID -> drb channel settings' is used to control this. The preferred method is 'From configuration protocol', which would work if unencrypted RRC appears in the trace, but if this is not possible, use 'From static table'. In this case, you need to open up 'LCID -> DRB Mappings Table' and manually configure RLC bearers for the LCIDs that are in use.

MartinM's avatar
197
MartinM
answered 2022-11-17 18:53:28 +0000
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

If 'From configuration protocol' is preferred, should that be the default setting in the preferences?
packet-mac-nr.c:

static gint global_mac_nr_lcid_drb_source = (gint)FromStaticTable;
Chuckc's avatar Chuckc (2022-11-17 19:01:40 +0000) edit
add a comment see more comments

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account. This space is reserved only for answers. If you would like to engage in a discussion, please instead post a comment under the question or an answer that you would like to discuss.

Add Answer