THIS IS A TEST INSTANCE. Feel free to ask and answer questions, but take care to avoid triggering too many notifications.
0

Wireshark 4 compilation on Centos7

  • retag add tags

Hello, On the release note of v4 it is specified that Libgcrypt version 1.8.0 (was 1.5.0) is required. Libgcrypt 1.8 is only supported from rel8 and therefore I'm getting the expected compilation error: CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake3/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:164 (message): Could NOT find GCRYPT: Found unsuitable version "1.5.3", but required is at least "1.8.0" (found /lib64/libgcrypt.so)

Wanted to ask if there's a way to bypass it and compile Wireshark 4 in centos 7.9?

Thanks in advance.

Aharon5's avatar
1
Aharon5
asked 2022-11-08 07:24:26 +0000
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag close merge delete

Comments

There's a discussion here - [Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8? - talking about versions.
You could modify CMakeLists.txt but then there will probably be more libraries that are not supported.

Chuckc's avatar Chuckc (2022-11-08 13:59:20 +0000) edit

Thank you!

Aharon5's avatar Aharon5 (2022-11-15 13:08:12 +0000) edit
add a comment see more comments

2 Answers

0

On CentOS there is an 'alternatives' command available that allows you to install alternatives, as in 'newer version'. For the man-page see https://linux.die.net/man/8/alternatives .

The page https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/alter... gives an example how to use it.

But getting it installed can still be hard when you run into a dependency-hell.

André's avatar
176
André
answered 2022-11-10 20:47:52 +0000
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

Thank you!

Aharon5's avatar Aharon5 (2022-11-15 09:39:32 +0000) edit
add a comment see more comments
0

According to the LifeCycle page on the Wiki, 3.4.x was the last version to support RH EL7 so you might be out of luck.

grahamb's avatar
23.8k
grahamb
answered 2022-11-08 10:16:25 +0000
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

Thank you!

Aharon5's avatar Aharon5 (2022-11-15 13:08:03 +0000) edit
add a comment see more comments

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account. This space is reserved only for answers. If you would like to engage in a discussion, please instead post a comment under the question or an answer that you would like to discuss.

Add Answer