Problems with DNS IXFR/AXFR

  • retag add tags

I have a problem with DNS IXFR/AXFR, that receives an answer in multiple packets. The situation is:

1- RFC1995 determines that IXFR can have an AXFR as a response;

2- RFC5936 says that AXFR can be sent over multiple responses.

So we have:

IXFR request -> Transaction ID 0x0001

First response -> Transaction ID 0x0001 (beginning with a SOA Type)

Following responses -> Transaction ID 0x0001 (until the end, ending with a SOA Type).

On responses from 2nd to last one, when clicking on the Transaction ID, wireshark says:

Expert Info (Warning/Protocol): DNS response retransmission. Original response in frame 340

Is it normal? Is there anything wrong with packets? Or wireshark is not ready for multiple response AXFR?

m.lanzuisi's avatar
1
m.lanzuisi
asked 2021-03-10 15:44:59 +0000, updated 2021-03-10 15:47:05 +0000
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag close merge delete

Comments

Can you share a capture with the packets at issue? Use a public share such as Google Drive, DropBox etc. and post a link to it back here.

grahamb's avatar grahamb (2021-03-11 14:02:29 +0000) edit

Unfortunately I cannot share a pcap, but can share some dropbox link to pkt images.

You can see query, first response pkt and second pkt.

Let me know if you need more

https://www.dropbox.com/s/r28nw3afk30...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xt7en8ncf28...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/w0awuokbcwn...

I can add to these pngs that first and last response are SOA type.

m.lanzuisi's avatar m.lanzuisi (2021-03-11 16:15:36 +0000) edit

As far as I can see WS has no support to handle multiple response records for one transaction ID so far. Can you open an issue at https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues and attach a sample capture (not screenshots)?

Uli's avatar Uli (2021-03-14 20:22:15 +0000) edit

Issue 17293 opened.

grahamb's avatar grahamb (2021-03-15 15:47:31 +0000) edit

Is the issue marked as confidential? I'm not able to see it...

Uli's avatar Uli (2021-03-15 20:58:57 +0000) edit
add a comment see more comments